Picture needed

[Coralsnake]

Looking for pictures of the 1969 GT350 z bar for clutch

[Redmach70]

Is it different from standard 351 Mach 1?You cannot view this attachment.

[Coralsnake]

I think it should bd the same, but I dont recall the peg on the side

Thanx

[Bob Gaines]

Is it different from standard 351 Mach 1?You cannot view this attachment.

Clutch rod and the chassis side bracket were bare steel on the assemblyline part. Most later service parts are plated .

[shelbymann1970]

Bob looks the same. Not at home but out of state but had a friend send me some pics of his and I sent them to Pete.

[Bob Gaines]

The picture of the Z bar is not the same as the one on my 69 GT350. The peg should not be there IMO. The hole that the peg is in is the hole where the lower anti rattle return spring attaches. If the hole in the peg was used for the springs attachment point it would put the spring too close to the engine block side.

[Bob Gaines]

Bob looks the same. Not at home but out of state but had a friend send me some pics of his and I sent them to Pete.

Gary, re read my post #3. The parts are finished different for the reasons I posted.

[J_Speegle]

Agree that hole didn't get a post. Must have been a PO add on in the past.

[shelbymann1970]

This is an original a friend has but added support.

[SIIIRHD88]

No peg on the '70 Cougar one I used on a 351C powered '68 GT FB.

[Bob Gaines]

Bob looks the same. Not at home but out of state but had a friend send me some pics of his and I sent them to Pete.

Apparently not the same then if it shouldn't have the post.