We have implemented a Photo Gallery for hosting images right here on SAACFORUM. Check the How-To in News from HQ
Quote from: Bob Gaines on February 28, 2026, 04:26:06 PMOckham's razor the problem-solving principle comes to mind when contemplating this issue.
Quote from: J_Speegle on February 28, 2026, 05:35:52 PM+1 . I have seen some late service replacements before they went obsolete that looked terrible . Even though they were serviced with the same number the last service replacements looked dramatically different then the assemblyline parts. In fact they looked as bad as the cheap repros which makes me suspect that is why the repros looked so terrible because the aftermarket copied the last service replacement. It has to do with the thickness of the metal and how the metal was formed.Quote from: Blackcar on February 28, 2026, 05:04:17 PMIs a NOS C5ZZ-E export brace considered a one for one replacement for a assembly line 67/68 export brace ?
Depends on when it was made and the details. Service replacements can and do have different details so comparing the specific part to an original is the place to start rather than a blanket statement IMO
We did a side by side comparison of an original 66 and a NOS/service replacement in a thread a while back. Think it was here or on CMF. Didn't do a search for it here on this site as of yet
Quote from: Blackcar on February 28, 2026, 05:04:17 PMIs a NOS C5ZZ-E export brace considered a one for one replacement for a assembly line 67/68 export brace ?
Quote from: Coralsnake on February 28, 2026, 02:24:59 PMIt's getting old fast.
Things I don't need "holy grail" or "barn find"
.
What happened to the original on/from your car?