News:

SAAC Member Badges are NOW available. Make your request through https://saac.wildapricot.org  to validate membership.

Main Menu

Shelby part #’s ???

Started by Kapracing, September 18, 2026, 04:45:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kapracing

I recently picked this up at SAAC 51. I assumed it to be a reproduction when I did. I took it out today and took a closer look and found these numbers cast into the part S8MS-8191-A.
What are your thoughts on this part? Real or aftermarket?

Thanks in advance

highland green

original fiberglass is usually pink on the back side. so my guess repo, others will know more. Pete has good reference on his site.

Bob Gaines

As good of a repro part as you will find. Many will give it the pink look with paint prior to painting as the assemblyline part will have body color overspray over the pink fiberglass instead of total coverage.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Coralsnake

Pink, white or even greenish colors on original glass. I'm not sure on this piece. I know some reproductions had part numbers.

I think the two center tabs should be more rounded
Shelby Historian. Check out theCoralsnake.com

I'm looking for 9F02M480004. Have you seen it?

68blk500c

Well, I'm sure it is a repro piece, with an poor attempt at an engineering #.  See original in photo:


Coralsnake

Shelby Historian. Check out theCoralsnake.com

I'm looking for 9F02M480004. Have you seen it?

Bob Gaines

Quote from: 68blk500c on September 20, 2026, 12:45:09 PMWell, I'm sure it is a repro piece, with an poor attempt at an engineering #.  See original in photo:


Yes they first came out over 20 years ago.Still the best alternative if you don't have a genuine to fix.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

68blk500c

Yes, it appears to be a quality repro part.  Engineering # was probably varied on purpose?

Bob Gaines

Quote from: 68blk500c on September 20, 2026, 04:22:50 PMYes, it appears to be a quality repro part.  Engineering # was probably varied on purpose?
A Nobel thought by a gentleman. I am more cynical and feel it is more likely based on other reproductions that have come to market that the MFG did not think that it was that important to be that exact. especially back when that reproduction letter panel was first made 25 plus years ago. 
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby