News:

SAAC Member Badges are NOW available. Make your request through https://saac.wildapricot.org  to validate membership.

Main Menu

Shelby part #’s ???

Started by Kapracing, September 18, 2026, 04:45:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kapracing

I recently picked this up at SAAC 51. I assumed it to be a reproduction when I did. I took it out today and took a closer look and found these numbers cast into the part S8MS-8191-A.
What are your thoughts on this part? Real or aftermarket?

Thanks in advance

highland green

original fiberglass is usually pink on the back side. so my guess repo, others will know more. Pete has good reference on his site.

Bob Gaines

As good of a repro part as you will find. Many will give it the pink look with paint prior to painting as the assemblyline part will have body color overspray over the pink fiberglass instead of total coverage.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

Coralsnake

Pink, white or even greenish colors on original glass. I'm not sure on this piece. I know some reproductions had part numbers.

I think the two center tabs should be more rounded
Shelby Historian. Check out theCoralsnake.com

I'm looking for 9F02M480004. Have you seen it?

68blk500c

Well, I'm sure it is a repro piece, with an poor attempt at an engineering #.  See original in photo:


Coralsnake

Shelby Historian. Check out theCoralsnake.com

I'm looking for 9F02M480004. Have you seen it?

Bob Gaines

Quote from: 68blk500c on September 20, 2026, 12:45:09 PMWell, I'm sure it is a repro piece, with an poor attempt at an engineering #.  See original in photo:


Yes they first came out over 20 years ago.Still the best alternative if you don't have a genuine to fix.
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

68blk500c

Yes, it appears to be a quality repro part.  Engineering # was probably varied on purpose?

Bob Gaines

Quote from: 68blk500c on September 20, 2026, 04:22:50 PMYes, it appears to be a quality repro part.  Engineering # was probably varied on purpose?
A Nobel thought by a gentleman. I am more cynical and feel it is more likely based on other reproductions that have come to market that the MFG did not think that it was that important to be that exact. especially back when that reproduction letter panel was first made 25 plus years ago. 
Bob Gaines,Shelby Enthusiast, Shelby Collector , Shelby Concours judge SAAC,MCA,Mid America Shelby

highland green

that piece is much better than the repo,I bought and never used. I chose to repair the original. if you dont have one ,Id use it.

shelbymann1970

Quote from: 68blk500c on September 20, 2026, 04:22:50 PMYes, it appears to be a quality repro part.  Engineering # was probably varied on purpose?
so what varied from the one in the OP pic and the pic you posted Don?
Shelby owner since 1984
SAAC member since 1990
1970 GT350 4 speed(owned since 1985).
  MCA gold 2003(not anymore)
1969 Mach1 428SCJ 4 speed R-code (owned since 2013)
"2nd" owner of 68 GT500 #1626

shelbymann1970

Quote from: highland green on September 20, 2026, 10:45:30 AMoriginal fiberglass is usually pink on the back side. so my guess repo, others will know more. Pete has good reference on his site.
I have original pieces that are white. I also have pink. My header that I'm using which I believe to be an original is white. My original header is pink( original paint broken in 2) When I get back home I'll look at the 2 and compare. My side scoops are white. Pass end cap is white. HL buckets pink. My 2 tail light panels.
Shelby owner since 1984
SAAC member since 1990
1970 GT350 4 speed(owned since 1985).
  MCA gold 2003(not anymore)
1969 Mach1 428SCJ 4 speed R-code (owned since 2013)
"2nd" owner of 68 GT500 #1626

68blk500c

My experience with unrestored 68s is the factory fiberglass was pink.  My experience with service NOS fiberglass is the earliest service parts were pink.  I also have seen NOS fiberglass that was mostly white with some blended pink.  I have had later boxed, service fiberglass that had a light gray primer shot on the paint surface (not the backside).  Even later boxed, NOS had darker primer on the paint surface.

Since we have photos here, without panels being side-by-side, it is not the best comparison situation.  I do know that the cast engineering # is wrong--wrong # info. and wrong font size/style. Here is a series of photos of an NOS panel and features, for reference.


68blk500c

#13
A couple more photos: