Messages

Cory's image lightened only to make it easier to see the "fastener in position" areas he circled - it really screws up the rest of the color of the shot but helps to se in the circled areas. - I can delete if he doesn't want it here.

Not sure if your car is a Shelby, but this thread might be of some help/info...

https://www.saac.com/forum/index.php?topic=9915.msg82813#msg82813

If you have the owners' manual that goes in the glove box that spec is in the back.

They don't show a part number for the 3 set versions they offer...in your case the top set

Black Strip Caulk, like used in other areas.

Does anyone know the Car Number - Please

Thank you Mr. Cantwell.

(here is the ISBN number for the book, ISBN 13: 9781935007296

note there was also a "Publisher's Edition that had more pages and images)

Have you contacted Dave Mathews the SAAC '67 Registrar?  He might know/have some history on your car that could help.

'67 Shelby Registrar - Dave Mathews: 67registrar@saac.com

AMK seems to offer them...click on camera symbol for photo of kit contents
https://www.amkproducts.com/i-kits/ford-individual-fastener-kits/?year_=1968&model=Mustang&category=Engine%20-%20352%2F390%2F428

Might be this at NPD:
https://www.npdlink.com/product/valve-cover-mounting-kit/105383/202848?search_started_at=1775672224638&year=1968

Early cars got one screw near the lowest point on the "tail" below the rear bumper, later cars gat three screws...

2025 Annual arrived in Ohio today - Thanks.

Buying a car you have not seen is like playing Russian Roulette.

...and there's more than one bullet in the gun!

[I assume not?]

Hey guys,

Sorry to resurrect such an old thread... but on a 67 Shelby... completed at SJ late December and completed initially at SAI Jan 17, 1967... would that car be "early" enough to need the "late 66" style sill plate emblem? I assume not?

I have an NOS set of the two line, coil snake version which I planned on using but just wanted to make sure that the CS emblem was only for VERY early cars.

Kind regards,
Vern

In "judging" I would be looking for the "two line, coil snake version" as it seems you are thinking too.

Back in the day, photographers were hired and paid for the photoshoot, they retained the film generally negatives as most persons or companies didn't have the dark room equipment and materials to make prints and do retouching or to properly store the film.  Then they also sold you prints as needed.

You could negotiate that you owned the film, but the photographer would still hold it for you and still make prints as required as most didn't have darkrooms and print making abilities.

The digital cameras and reproduction output methods (taking your own photo editing "PhotShop" for sizing, cropping etc., to make files for sending out for any and all needs) came and changed some/all of that, as well as scanners to turn existing film into digital files.  The waters got muddier.

Different venues (print, on-line etc.) want different file sizes & types a whole maze in itself.

Now you can negotiate getting the (copies) of the original digital but sometimes you still need to acknowledge the photographer.

I too had heard there was an issue, years ago, with Friedman and SAAC (Kopec?) about receiving/being given film and loaning back film and not getting it returned and then Dave sold it and got it (borrowed) it back more than once to other entities? and others were not pleased with him?

Just some info, others will know or contribute more.

[the second photo of the "red" car is of an Alfa Romeo Junior Zagato.]

Nice selection of cars on the greens....the second photo of the "red" car is of an Alfa Romeo Junior Zagato.

BINGO!

Yes, thanks for posting these, this was last weekend?