Quote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on September 03, 2026, 10:13:34 PMI think that car also ran at LeMans. It wasn't a factory effort.
Exact
We have implemented a Photo Gallery for hosting images right here on SAACFORUM. Check the How-To in News from HQ
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on September 03, 2026, 10:13:34 PMI think that car also ran at LeMans. It wasn't a factory effort.
Quote from: 6s1640 on March 26, 2026, 01:00:18 PMHi Joe,
Glad to help. I added one dimension to the end of the curved spanner bar 3/32 radius on the end. I measured the thickness at .094 inches. This is a little under 12 gauge steel. Best of luck.
Cory
Quote from: 6s1640 on March 25, 2026, 11:44:18 PMHi Joe, you can also try this dimensioned drawing.
Cory
Quote from: J_Speegle on March 25, 2026, 09:34:09 PMI think you meant to type the short or curved tab ones.
Quote from: J_Speegle on March 25, 2026, 09:34:09 PMAlso the ones in your picture have rounded corners at the end of the tabs unlike originals as well as the "bump" in the tabs or arms
Quote from: Royce Peterson on February 21, 2025, 09:24:34 AMI think the original motor is more important in a more valuable car. Let's face it, the 1968 GT350 is the least desirable Shelby. A more desirable Shelby would be the 1967 GT500 - if one of those has its original 428 it is unusual because most of them were blown up long ago. Maybe in that case it would affect value - most folks would prefer a roller motor 347 in a '68 GT350. At least I would.But the 1967 GT500 is the only Shelby where it is impossible to know if it is the original engine because in 1967 the 428 engines did not have the VIN stamped so you just need to have the correct date.