Here are a couple of shots (less than perfect) from back in the day that have been posted in the past.
We have implemented a Photo Gallery for hosting images right here on SAACFORUM. Check the How-To in News from HQ
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts Menu
Quote from: CharlesTurner on December 04, 2025, 12:46:47 AMIf the car had any of the original suspension, it would be worth evaluating what is there and determining if any of it is good enough to restore.
Quote from: TransamEd on December 03, 2025, 01:20:12 AMCharles Turner above probably related to these special orders. (taken from a Microfiche system by a friend decades ago) (R-model batch order shown here). I sent them back then to Howard. At that time he had not seen them at least.
The later changes were issued more in a handwritten style as supplements.
Quote from: S7MS427 on December 02, 2025, 04:37:33 PMSo what is out there that most of us have never seen? What were the actual documents that were used to build the cars we all love so much? ..........
Quote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on December 01, 2025, 07:52:06 PMThis appears to be just a dealer order form (as it states on the bottom line). Note it says TO: Shelby American Inc.
I think any formal 65/6 production form did not exist. An order came in and the lot boy was told to go get X color car. When it started down the line there may have been a copy of the order stuck under a windshield wiper or some code for options was written in grease pencil on the glass. But no photos have surfaced showing either.
Quote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on December 01, 2025, 07:52:06 PMAre any people left who worked on the line day to day? In any case once it left the line there was no reason to retain the build options - they were noted on the invoice SA sent to the dealer.
Quote from: S7MS427 on December 01, 2025, 08:27:32 AMJeff,
That looks pretty close and might show the evolution from one form to the next. I wouldn't think that there would be another similar document, but who knows? Do you have any that are filled out? Like I said, I'm trying to understand how the production process differed from year to year. I'd like to see scans of as many as you might have that are filled out.
Quote from: S7MS427 on November 30, 2025, 10:37:03 PMJeff,
This is in regards to the construction of the 1965 and 1966 cars. My question is, was a version of the form that you show for the 1967 cars also used for the 1965 and/or 1966 cars? D. Mathews would not be of any help in this regard as he deals exclusively with the 1967 cars. Just trying to find out how far back (if at all) the use of this document extends. Again this is NOT a question regarding.......................

Quote from: S7MS427 on November 30, 2025, 08:07:55 PMFor '65 and '66 GT350s, did SAI use a production order similar to the '67 builds? If so, are those available? Thanks.
Quote from: Coralsnake on November 29, 2025, 01:43:19 PM...I would highly recommend anyone to attend an event, before throwing themselves into the fire.
Quote from: Paulb on November 28, 2025, 11:17:46 PMBut Div 2 is non-NOS?
Quote from: Fd243 on November 27, 2025, 08:39:35 PMQuote from: Cobra Ned on November 27, 2025, 01:13:42 PMIs there anyone from the LA area who might be able to ID the Ford dealer advertising the white Cobra with a green stripe (CSX 3348) by the phone number (SY3-3154) ? The car was supposedly at S&C in San Francisco at this time but was transferred to Robert Loud Ford in Pasadena in May, a month after this ad appeared.
AI inquiry yields high confidence that number is for S&C Ned, one of several reasons being the SY prefix was not used in the Colorado Blvd area where Robert Loud Ford was located