Hello Ned,
I do remember some issue with the ownership of the negatives from about 20 +/- years ago or something. Didn't Dave try or did attempt to "reacquire" the negatives back? As early SAI images and history regained popularity.
I vaguely remember hearing about this. It put David Friedman in a very bad light and made him very unpopular. (I'm being nice in my choice of words).
The pictures/images he took were incredible as it documented SAI from the beginning. But using your analogy of a wedding photographer and ownership of the negatives, was part of the issue.
Again this is what I remember, correct me if I'm wrong.
Cheers,
~Earl J
(Ned, don't you miss your Lake Pacid "cottage"? ~E)
I do remember some issue with the ownership of the negatives from about 20 +/- years ago or something. Didn't Dave try or did attempt to "reacquire" the negatives back? As early SAI images and history regained popularity.
I vaguely remember hearing about this. It put David Friedman in a very bad light and made him very unpopular. (I'm being nice in my choice of words).
The pictures/images he took were incredible as it documented SAI from the beginning. But using your analogy of a wedding photographer and ownership of the negatives, was part of the issue.
Again this is what I remember, correct me if I'm wrong.
Cheers,
~Earl J
(Ned, don't you miss your Lake Pacid "cottage"? ~E)