SAAC Forum

Deals and Appeals => Up For Auction => Topic started by: 5s386 on February 03, 2026, 11:31:42 PM

Title: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: 5s386 on February 03, 2026, 11:31:42 PM
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1967-shelby-mustang-gt500-31/
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 12:38:56 PM
...and the silliness has begun!
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: SFM5S000 on February 04, 2026, 02:49:23 PM
Quote from: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 12:38:56 PM...and the silliness has begun!

Pete, enlighten me. Do you have issues with the seller or issues with the car? Just curious. The seller 1600Veloce sells quite a few high end cars. Again, just curious.

Cheers,
~Earl J
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 02:52:19 PM
I dont have any issues with car or the seller. The comments are entertaining.

Especially the ones about the stripes and block stampings. They never seem to change...regardless of the car
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: SFM5S000 on February 04, 2026, 04:25:57 PM
Okay, yup you're right. The peanut gallery comments. I get it. Agreed.

~E
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 04:35:46 PM
Well I'm 99.9% sure I'm right. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: SCJSTU on February 04, 2026, 06:32:49 PM
Quote from: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 04:35:46 PMWell I'm 99.9% sure I'm right. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

.01 percent wrong?    Oh my
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 06:53:05 PM
You have to read all the comments to really appreciate that one...
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: pbf777 on February 04, 2026, 07:06:22 PM
Quote from: SFM5S000 on February 04, 2026, 02:49:23 PMThe seller 1600Veloce sells quite a few high end cars.

     If you follow his presentations and commenting, he's definitely a "used car salesman"!  ::)
     
     Scott.
     
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: cobrachi on February 04, 2026, 07:54:21 PM
LOL.. " What will it take to put you into this car today ???".... ::)
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: trotrof1 on February 04, 2026, 09:06:35 PM
If it had a real PI engine I'm sure that would be in the description.
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Scode67FB on February 05, 2026, 12:27:23 AM
I could be wrong, but it doesn't look like it has a Nodular rear.
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Nightmist on February 05, 2026, 03:25:41 AM
This BaT dealer does nice photos and videos but avoids answering questions directly and always has a lot of (related?) cheerleaders in the comments.  I've heard 95% of their BaT auctions sell to buyers that never comment, ask a question or visit the car for an inspection.  I guess social media promotion does wonders.  Does the car have the correct engine/date code, carburetor and SPEC rear end?
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: BGlover67 on February 05, 2026, 09:28:24 AM
BaT has become such a sitcom to watch.  I love the eye candy but can't stand the comments from all the crazies out there.  It seems people want cars like these, most can't afford them or can't justify spending the money so they make negative and disparaging comments.  Like that makes any sense...
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: shelbymann1970 on February 05, 2026, 12:12:59 PM
Quote from: Coralsnake on February 04, 2026, 02:52:19 PMI dont have any issues with car or the seller. The comments are entertaining.

Especially the ones about the stripes and block stampings. They never seem to change...regardless of the car

Pete, Mike Johnson(used to have a lime god 68 KR that Tim did and a Corvette judge and 65 owner) asked for your insight there as he is BigTanks and you havew not responded. Shame on you  ;D . I wish Brian Styles who gives out those BatMan slapping Robin T shirts to 67 owners over the PI vs SI engines on 67s would make some of those Batman shirts up about "holy Grail" cars.... Yes. Pete, the silliness is there as always. Bat loves those commentators and hates those who know facts because facts might hit their bottom line of not so honest sellers selling cars there.
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: shelbymann1970 on February 05, 2026, 12:14:49 PM
Quote from: Nightmist on February 05, 2026, 03:25:41 AMThis BaT dealer does nice photos and videos but avoids answering questions directly and always has a lot of (related?) cheerleaders in the comments.  I've heard 95% of their BaT auctions sell to buyers that never comment, ask a question or visit the car for an inspection.  I guess social media promotion does wonders.  Does the car have the correct engine/date code, carburetor and SPEC rear end?
Well said.
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: shelbymann1970 on February 05, 2026, 12:29:18 PM
I have a good friend who is dying and has about 3 weeks left. He only buys good cars for his collection. I had him send me some pics of his cars he wanted to sell before he died. He sold his mancave building to an old friend. So far he has sold his 71 original paint 455HO 4 speed 20K mile Trans am. 2 others sold to a guy in the Detroit area who is the king of Trans Ams so to speak all going real quick as the 71 TA went back to the prior owner. He had 2 cars left. A 72 red GTO 455 HO M22 4 speed with the WW5 package. over 50 percent original paint. Absolutely a beautiful show looking car in the pics. Well when we talked he said it was a "20 footer" with some paint issues on the original paint on the roof but still showed well. My point? Many cars on BAT have looked much better because the "fancy" pictures have portrayed them wrong. A guy named Bruno near Toronto bought the Goat the other day and will race it at the pure stock nationals In Stanton Mi  where he races rare Chevy and Pontiac iron along with his kids.  His one car left is his 69 Ford Cobra. 32K miles and original paint with one fender repainted because a prior owner scratched it. Anyone interested in a MCACN survivor candidate   the car is for sale for around 60K USD(my friend lives in Windsor). He said 60-70K. He has went so far as to replace a heater hose clamp with a date coded original one and planned on doing a MCACN show in the future but cancer got in the way. Gary
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Coralsnake on February 05, 2026, 01:11:30 PM
He must be talking about another "Pete"?

I usually don't comment on the 1967s.

 ;D
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: roddster on February 05, 2026, 01:13:25 PM
  I read the Bat listing, down to the comments.  I'm not confused, but why are the many commenters?  Somehow, the car got a 390 incorrect engine to get it mobile.  THEN a non-original 428 was built and installed.  So, why the concern over the VIN stamp being on the engine?  Didn't anyone read that?
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: Coralsnake on February 05, 2026, 01:34:25 PM
I think that car is actually on its third engine?

The conversations on numbers is always fun.

On the 1968 big blocks it identifies one head on a good day. Thats it. Everything else could be from anywhere.

The stripe conversations are also very entertaining.
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: pbf777 on February 05, 2026, 01:55:58 PM
Quote from: Nightmist on February 05, 2026, 03:25:41 AMThis BaT dealer does nice photos and videos but avoids answering questions directly and always has a lot of (related?) cheerleaders in the comments.  I've heard 95% of their BaT auctions sell to buyers that never comment, ask a question or visit the car for an inspection. 

    And one of their BAT listings which I had shown "some" interest in by calling the dealership to inquire as to perhaps what kind of value they were placing on the item as being auctioned, at which point I about fell out of my chair; but it "SOLD" for about 1/6th (closer to a reasonable market value  ;) ) of what they wanted for it of the floor; but then they called me three more times after the BAT auction had ended, still looking for the "big money"!  :o

    Don't believe everything is as presented!  ::)

    Scott.
Title: Re: 67400F5A01128 on BAT
Post by: TLea on February 05, 2026, 02:50:21 PM
Everyone who comments on BAT is an expert didn't you know?