SAAC Forum

The Cars => 1966 Shelby GT350/GT350H => Topic started by: GeotechDuck on September 22, 2024, 11:48:04 PM

Title: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on September 22, 2024, 11:48:04 PM
Hi Everyone,
We have a 66 GT350H - original 289 HiPo & C4 transmission.  However, at some point the rear end gears were switched out to 4.11s.  As you can imagine, freeway driving is pretty brutal.  I don't have it up on the freeway that often, and when I do, it is usually only for a few miles.   However, we may start looking to drive it on some longer day trips and want freeway driving to be a little more reasonable. 

Right now I am 3500+ RPMs on the freeway at around 65 mph.  Also, it usually shifts out of 1st almost immediately off the line unless you are really standing on it.   

What are others running with a C4? 3.50, 3.25, 3.00? 

Not tracking the car.  It is a weekend driver, mostly cruising on weekends for coffee and shows.

Looking to be able to cruise at 75mph, but also want to keep some get up and go off the line.  Is 3.25 a good middle ground here?  Calculator shows RPMs will be under 3500 at 75mph, which is good, but not sure how much off the line acceleration I am giving up to get there. 

 

Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: Bob Gaines on September 23, 2024, 01:22:57 AM
Quote from: GeotechDuck on September 22, 2024, 11:48:04 PMHi Everyone,
We have a 66 GT350H - original 289 HiPo & C4 transmission.  However, at some point the rear end gears were switched out to 4.11s.  As you can imagine, freeway driving is pretty brutal.  I don't have it up on the freeway that often, and when I do, it is usually only for a few miles.   However, we may start looking to drive it on some longer day trips and want freeway driving to be a little more reasonable. 

Right now I am 3500+ RPMs on the freeway at around 65 mph.  Also, it usually shifts out of 1st almost immediately off the line unless you are really standing on it.   

What are others running with a C4? 3.50, 3.25, 3.00? 

Not tracking the car.  It is a weekend driver, mostly cruising on weekends for coffee and shows.

Looking to be able to cruise at 75mph, but also want to keep some get up and go off the line.  Is 3.25 a good middle ground here?  Calculator shows RPMs will be under 3500 at 75mph, which is good, but not sure how much off the line acceleration I am giving up to get there. 

 


3:50 was the factory gear for the C4 in your GT350. You will give up a little acceleration if you go to the more rpm friendly 3:25 gears but I doubt given what you described as your driving habits you will notice a difference between the 3:50 and the 3:25 IMO.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: FL SAAC on September 23, 2024, 04:19:20 PM
On the 1966 GTH 3.5 gear was the factory choice for the C4

Would not change it to anything else on ours

Best of luck
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: shelbydoug on September 23, 2024, 05:04:33 PM
There is a "C4" overdrive transission which is essentially a C4 with a 4th gear. Going from memory on this , the overdrive would effectively give you 2.80 rear when in overdrive.

Since that transmission is essentially a bolt in, you can put the original aside and run the od trans.

I'd have to find the gear ratio chart which is not at hand, but if you were considering doing something to make it cruise better, the OD trans should be a serious consideration.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: pbf777 on September 23, 2024, 08:00:31 PM
Quote from: shelbydoug on September 23, 2024, 05:04:33 PMThere is a "C4" overdrive transission which is essentially a C4 with a 4th gear.

Since that transmission is essentially a bolt in, you can put the original aside and run the od trans.

    I'm assuming that this "C4 overdrive transmission" you might be referencing is the "A.O.D.", this as found, in as of others, the FOX Mustangs?  :-\

    If so, just a note: The A.O.D. utilizes the 164 tooth flex-plate (which is of the wrong 50 in. oz. balance application for the "5.0" engine, but the proper 28 in. oz. application is available) and hence the resultant larger area required for this vs. the 157T earlier C4 applications.  Unlike the C4 where the bell housings are a separate component of the assembly, this allowing swapping for different flywheels, the A.O.D.'s is cast a one incorporated with the gear case.  :)

    I do consider, for those not so concerned with originality, but rather wish to enjoy the vehicle to a greater extent, the conversion to the A.O.D. a good choice; and we have executed many a transformation with no regrets (that I can remember anyway  ::) ) for any of those customers.  8)

    Scott.

   
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: shelbydoug on September 24, 2024, 08:02:15 AM
When I ran that by Randy, i.e., "how about using a 6R80?", he said he had no experience with them but the AOD would work very well.

I'd need to look up the details of that discussion but my recollection was that it wasn't a difficult switch over.



My initial investigation showed the same regular gears as a C4 and just the forth gear was the overdrive.

In my constant, self annoying, self analyzation, I liked the super low first gear (4.17, 2.34 second, 1.52 third, ) and the double overdrive of the 6R80 (1.14 forth, 0.87 fifth, and 0.69:1 sixth).

The mere fact of it needing a computer sub plug in device was not daunting but the mere size of the tail shaft is, particularly in that few, if any had put one in an "early Mustang" but in thinking of a contingency plan in which an issue arrives by which the left leg no longer is capable of operating a high performance clutch, re-installing an automatic trans could in some way or form be acceptable to me? Thus the AOD OR more desirably, the 6R80.

Being in sixth would make your final drive a 2.14:1. That in fact could be too tall for just a 289? First gear 4.17 would make it pull like it had 6.20 ears in first. You could probably almost pull a wheelie with that?

Us "old folk" need to have a contingency plan other then a new Corvette with an "automatic only" transmission option?  8)

Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: 68stangcjfb on September 24, 2024, 09:59:24 AM
Not exactly Apples to Apples comparison as I have a four-speed in my Fairlane station wagon so you have to account for some torque converter slippage and I am running a 28 inch tall rear tire (275/60/15). In 4th gear, 3.50 gears give me 3000 rpm at 70 mph. 3.25 gears gave me 3000 rpm at 75 mph. 4.11 gears gave me 3000 rpm at 55 mph. 3.89 gears gave me 3000 rpm at 60. Mph Figures were gathered using Waze give or take a mile an hour or two. I've tried all these gears and for my car the 3.50s were the best compromise. If your car has lower height tires the 3.25s might make a better choice. The overdrive transmission would be the best choice if you would like to keep the 4.11s but also the most expensive one.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on September 24, 2024, 01:01:11 PM
Thank you all for the quick replies.  I am running a 205/70R14 tire, which I believe the height is just a hair over 25 inches.  I checked it and I should be able to reduce the RPMs by about 500 at 75 mph on the freeway.  If I can get to 3,500 at 75mph, that is probably good enough. 

I actually have a set of 3.50 gears in my garage, so maybe that is a good place to start.

Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: shelbydoug on September 24, 2024, 02:04:57 PM
Quote from: Bob Gaines on September 23, 2024, 01:22:57 AM
Quote from: GeotechDuck on September 22, 2024, 11:48:04 PMHi Everyone,
We have a 66 GT350H - original 289 HiPo & C4 transmission.  However, at some point the rear end gears were switched out to 4.11s.  As you can imagine, freeway driving is pretty brutal.  I don't have it up on the freeway that often, and when I do, it is usually only for a few miles.   However, we may start looking to drive it on some longer day trips and want freeway driving to be a little more reasonable. 

Right now I am 3500+ RPMs on the freeway at around 65 mph.  Also, it usually shifts out of 1st almost immediately off the line unless you are really standing on it.   

What are others running with a C4? 3.50, 3.25, 3.00? 

Not tracking the car.  It is a weekend driver, mostly cruising on weekends for coffee and shows.

Looking to be able to cruise at 75mph, but also want to keep some get up and go off the line.  Is 3.25 a good middle ground here?  Calculator shows RPMs will be under 3500 at 75mph, which is good, but not sure how much off the line acceleration I am giving up to get there. 

 


3:50 was the factory gear for the C4 in your GT350. You will give up a little acceleration if you go to the more rpm friendly 3:25 gears but I doubt given what you described as your driving habits you will notice a difference between the 3:50 and the 3:25 IMO.

I agree with Bob in the sense that there isn't a big enough difference between the 325s and the 350s.

To quite down the beast you are looking for a final drive ratio in the 2.50 to 2.80 vicinity which is where the AOD will put you without loosing the first gear pickup.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: NC TRACKRAT on September 25, 2024, 02:30:24 PM
...OR...You could install the 3.50 rear, then pull out that rare C-4 C-code for safekeeping and install a T5 5-speed. Easy conversion kits out there. That OD 5th gear will give you just what you need on the highway.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: 6s1640 on September 25, 2024, 03:58:29 PM
When I drove my GT350 to SAAC 35 in San Rafael California, I pulled the 3.89 and put in 3.00 gears.  It was a 2000 mile round trip.  IIRC, the car would do 75 MPH around 3100 rpm.  It made the trip much more doable.  I had no issues starting from a stand still with the close ration T-10M1.  It also helped on the mileage for such a long trip.  The car got 18 mpg.

Best of luck

Cory
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: Bob Gaines on September 25, 2024, 04:45:57 PM
The 9 inch rear end set up makes it relatively easy to switch out the center section gear setup. I know of numerous people besides myself that have a extra center section setup with higher or lower gears depending on if highway or drags.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on September 25, 2024, 04:51:46 PM
Quote from: NC TRACKRAT on September 25, 2024, 02:30:24 PM...OR...You could install the 3.50 rear, then pull out that rare C-4 C-code for safekeeping and install a T5 5-speed. Easy conversion kits out there. That OD 5th gear will give you just what you need on the highway.

This is something I have seriously considered in the past, but was always worried about impacting the original car.  From what I have read, I believe this is a very straight forward conversion and can be done without modifying the car (cutting / welding)?  If I could do this and still get it back to original without too much hassle, then maybe it is worth considering?
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on September 25, 2024, 04:53:20 PM
Quote from: 6s1640 on September 25, 2024, 03:58:29 PMWhen I drove my GT350 to SAAC 35 in San Rafael California, I pulled the 3.89 and put in 3.00 gears.  It was a 2000 mile round trip.  IIRC, the car would do 75 MPH around 3100 rpm.  It made the trip much more doable.  I had no issues starting from a stand still with the close ration T-10M1.  It also helped on the mileage for such a long trip.  The car got 18 mpg.

Best of luck

Cory

Thanks Cory!  I was probably there for that event.  I grew up in San Rafael. 
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on September 25, 2024, 04:58:18 PM
Quote from: Bob Gaines on September 25, 2024, 04:45:57 PMThe 9 inch rear end set up makes it relatively easy to switch out the center section gear setup. I know of numerous people besides myself that have a extra center section setup with higher or lower gears depending on if highway or drags.

Hi Bob,
Thank you for the response. I have a complete center section with 3.50s sitting in my garage that I picked up a while back.  Would be an easy swap, so I could probably start there and see how things go.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: Bob Gaines on September 25, 2024, 05:03:17 PM
Quote from: GeotechDuck on September 25, 2024, 04:51:46 PM
Quote from: NC TRACKRAT on September 25, 2024, 02:30:24 PM...OR...You could install the 3.50 rear, then pull out that rare C-4 C-code for safekeeping and install a T5 5-speed. Easy conversion kits out there. That OD 5th gear will give you just what you need on the highway.

This is something I have seriously considered in the past, but was always worried about impacting the original car.  From what I have read, I believe this is a very straight forward conversion and can be done without modifying the car (cutting / welding)?  If I could do this and still get it back to original without too much hassle, then maybe it is worth considering?
As far as impacting the car besides the work needed to do the conversion you have to knock out a metal plug in the firewall for the clutch pedal rod and of course find a clutch pedal, bushing and hardware to add to your automatic pedal support. The manual reverse light harness needs to have a hole put in the tunnel for it because it is different then the auto .
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: NC TRACKRAT on September 25, 2024, 07:14:15 PM
...and you'll need a driveshaft cut to the correct length, a bellhousing, clutch, pressure plate and throw-out bearing and arm with adjuster rod and a 4-speed shift lever. The conversion requires a special transmission support bracket and an adapter plate between the tranny and the bellhousing.  The bellhousing needs a minor mod that any competent machine shop can handle. No metal was cut to install the shifter. It was a fun project!
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: shelbydoug on September 25, 2024, 07:48:58 PM
It's an easy swap but I'd use a 24" top loader if I went to a manual, and I have done that swap. That way the yoke and the driveshaft that you have will swap over. You can put a plug in the punch out if you go back to the automatic.

The speedometer will also hook right up with no changes, but you may need to play with the speedo drive gear to get it to read accurately?

Switching from an automatic to a manual will change the character of the car though, I think for the better?


I had the AOD in my 302 Granada. It's a nice transmission. With it you could leave the 4.11's in with it. 4th gear would be the equivalent of 2.75:1.

With the 4.11s and the AOD, first gear would give you the same acceleration factor as a top loader and 3.89 gears. That isn't shabby.

So it looks like you have some very nice alternatives to choose from?
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: 98SVT - was 06GT on September 25, 2024, 09:11:39 PM
Quote from: 6s1640 on September 25, 2024, 03:58:29 PM..... I pulled the 3.89 and put in 3.00 gears. .... The car got 18 mpg.
A guy gave me a D code 289 for a 65 Fastback I was piecing together. I bottle brush honed it, put in cheap rings and bearings along with the 100,000+ mile HiPo cam from 843. A $25 swap meet Shelby aluminum intake and Holley 600 vac secondary carb. The car had 2.8 gears and fetched 28 mpg on it's inaugural trip to Monterey. I've got to find the pic of the car Kopec sent me with its 14x7 Minilites that SAAC sent out the offer for - if anyone has a set of those (or 15x7) they'd like to part with PM me.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: NC TRACKRAT on September 25, 2024, 09:17:01 PM
A top loader is a great tranny but it won't give the OP that overdrive 5th gear that the T5 has.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: TA Coupe on September 26, 2024, 12:37:53 AM
Quote from: 98SVT - was 06GT on September 25, 2024, 09:11:39 PM
Quote from: 6s1640 on September 25, 2024, 03:58:29 PM..... I pulled the 3.89 and put in 3.00 gears. .... The car got 18 mpg.
A guy gave me a D code 289 for a 65 Fastback I was piecing together. I bottle brush honed it, put in cheap rings and bearings along with the 100,000+ mile HiPo cam from 843. A $25 swap meet Shelby aluminum intake and Holley 600 vac secondary carb. The car had 2.8 gears and fetched 28 mpg on it's inaugural trip to Monterey. I've got to find the pic of the car Kopec sent me with its 14x7 Minilites that SAAC sent out the offer for - if anyone has a set of those (or 15x7) they'd like to part with PM me.
I believe I have a full set of original lug nuts for the 14x7 minilites if you're interested.

      Roy
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: shelbydoug on September 26, 2024, 12:46:52 PM
Quote from: NC TRACKRAT on September 25, 2024, 09:17:01 PMA top loader is a great tranny but it won't give the OP that overdrive 5th gear that the T5 has.

Yes, it is a good option but not as bolt in as a T & C is.

Give the man time to digest some of this. I am sure that he feels like an intoxicated giraffe on roller skates stuck in a revolving door? It's all a blur.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: NC TRACKRAT on September 26, 2024, 05:10:30 PM
 ;D Great verbal visualization!  Suggestion for the OP:  Install the 3:50 gear and see if that does enough for you.  That will put it back to "stock...as delivered" condition. IF you need/want less revs, we've given you some options.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on September 26, 2024, 08:05:08 PM

Quote from: shelbydoug on September 26, 2024, 12:46:52 PMGive the man time to digest some of this. I am sure that he feels like an intoxicated giraffe on roller skates stuck in a revolving door? It's all a blur.


Hahahaha.  :D

Going to 3.50s to start.  Manual trans still under consideration.  Thanks for all the information, everyone!!
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: 98SVT - was 06GT on September 26, 2024, 09:40:12 PM
Quote from: TA Coupe on September 26, 2024, 12:37:53 AMI believe I have a full set of original lug nuts for the 14x7 minilites if you're interested.
It shocked me they were aluminum. I was leary but they worked fine.
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on March 31, 2025, 10:44:47 PM
Thanks again for all the advice.  I got tied up at work for a little bit, but I am finally installing the 3.50s this week.  We will see how that goes and then figure out what is next.

I am going to try get a little work done before SAAC-50.       
Title: Re: Rear Gear Ratio Question with C4
Post by: GeotechDuck on April 03, 2025, 08:20:53 PM
Well.......that helped.  Much more friendly on the freeway with the 3.50s. Thanks everyone!!