Tire is a 245/45R17 Firehawk.
We have implemented a Photo Gallery for hosting images right here on SAACFORUM. Check the How-To in News from HQ
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Richstang on August 07, 2021, 06:11:24 PMQuote from: JD on August 07, 2021, 11:58:58 AM
^^^Thanks Jon ;-)
(Car #33 was originally a Black car, maybe it's been repainted and had some "updates" over the years, not much in the Registry on it)
The Paxton '67 is #0083 as Craig mentioned previously. He confirmed that with a few more photos by email.
Quote from: JD on August 06, 2021, 11:08:33 PMQuote from: 6s341 on August 06, 2021, 03:54:20 PM
To help with questions...Paxton powered! It was a great looking '67 pitted near us, but I didn't get the number...
Thanks - she's looking good! (Whatever number she is)
Quote from: J_Speegle on June 07, 2021, 02:49:42 PMMichigan manufacturer's plates are six digits with a small M in the center and Manufacturer at the bottom. Unfortunately, Historic plates are also six digits, so every so often I get a bill from the North Texas Tollway Authority for tolls. They send a picture of the manufacturers plate whose numbers match my '68, except no M. I send them a nice message that they have the wrong vehicle and after another message and a phone call they stop sending me bills. Until the next time this plate ignores the toll booth.
Manufactures plates are different than what were assigned to regular vehicles owned by individuals. Pattern and plate lay out is different. On the Manufactures plates there were dozens or hundreds in some cases assigned to the company for their use. Difference in those on Calif plates is the smaller letters and numbers to the left of the MFG
Quote from: Side-Oilers on May 28, 2020, 04:43:39 PM
Great read and memories of a much simpler era. I didn't make it to that Dearborn SAAC event, but was there for the '83 Convention.
I knew Paul Preuss from Ford PR, and he was a great guy.
Quote from: shelbydoug on May 16, 2021, 06:51:08 AMI will just say, State Farm was a poor choice 52 years ago, when my mother had it. Obviously, they have not improved.
I had a claim with State Farm on a non-Shelby car but with one that Hagerty valued at $9,200 in it's then present condition.
State Farm said it was only worth $1,100.
In the debate State Farm produced an "evaluation" from an independent underwriter that showed the number but yet could produce no evidence such as current auction results.
They refused to accept other evaluations such as Hagerty's as hearsay.
So this really is relevant in that the only place that will accept your $350,000 valuation is Hagerty. If for sake of discussion, you had a claim against a State Farm insured, expect an extended argument.
They will produce "evidence" with no documentation showing a much lower valuation and refuse to accept "auction results" as unsubstantiated so you'll be back to negotiating a number.
Lots of things are reducing the useage of "vintage vehicles" including this one but also the traffic generally is heavier, the owners are older and no one wants to advertise what they have.