The SHELBY AMERICAN
Spring 2016 5
The bill was passed by the
U.S. Congress and signed by the
President in December, 2015. Ac-
cording to information printed in
the Specialty Equipment Market
Association’s
Driving
Force
newsletter, the bill was the result
of a year-long effort by SEMA
with support from the specialty
equipment industry. It means
that a company can legally sell a
turn-key replica Cobra. It must
meet federal equipment stan-
dards (lighting, tires, windshield,
brake hoses, etc) but is exempt
from vehicle standards such as
roof crush, side impact and crash
testing. Turn-key vehicles must
also meet current Clean Air Act
emissions standards. Manufactur-
ers must install a certified engine
package from a current model
year vehicle or a crate engine that
has been certified by the Califor-
nia Air Resources Board (CARB).
It will then be permanently ex-
empt from emissions testing.
What does this mean? You can
purchase a turn-key Cobra replica
that is powered by, say, a current
Ford crate engine that has al-
ready been certified. However, if
you want something with a 289
Hi-Po or a 427 medium riser, the
rules have not essentially
changed. You’re still on your own,
buying the roller separately and
getting the engine somewhere
else. And then dealing with your
state’s DMV to register it.
We don’t know if all this is
good or bad. It appears to be the
federal government’s attempt to
install a one-size-fits-all solution
to replicas while, at the same
time, tangling them up in current
emission requirements. We have
an EPA so they naturally feel that
they must get involved. We sus-
pect that the more time that
passes, fewer and fewer replica
owners will consider original
specifications as important as
they presently do. Whatever hap-
pens, once federal regulations are
put in place, they are rarely re-
scinded. They just grow.
THE END OF RACING ?
Elsewhere in this issue we re-
ferred to news of the new federal law
that will allow manufacturers of
replica vehicles to sidestep some gov-
ernment regulations as long as they
build cars powered by current-year
EPA certified engines. We remain con-
vinced that once NHTSA and EPA be-
come involved with hobby vehicles,
their interest will only expand.
The latest incursion by the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency is a pro-
posed regulation that would prohibit
the conversion of street vehicles into
race cars. It would also make it illegal
to sell certain parts and products for
racing purposes on street vehicles. The
proposed regulation was hidden in a
non-related regulation titled, “Green-
house Gas Emissions and Fuel Effi-
cient Standards for Medium- and
Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles –
Phase 2.”
If this law was passed it would im-
pact all vehicle types such as sports
cars, sedans and hatchbacks most
commonly converted for use at the
race track. The Clean Air Act already
prohibits certain modifications to
motor vehicles but it was never in-
tended to regulate vehicles built or
modified for racing as long as they
were not used on the street.
Picture rows of grim, dour bureau-
crats shuffling the stacks of papers on
their desks without giving a thought
to any possible enjoyment citizens
might receive from either participat-
ing in or watching automotive compe-
tition. The parking lot outside their of
their office is probably filled with
Volts, Prius’ and Smart Cars. Could
they care any less that these proposed
EPA regulations represent govern-
mental overreach at its worst, running
contrary to the law and defying
decades of racing activity where the
EPA, itself, has allowed conversion of
vehicles for racing? Probably not.
As soon as word of this impending
action was splashed across the Inter-
net there was an immediate firestorm
of protest. Car enthusiasts contacted
their representatives in Congress, re-
sulting in the proposal being with-
drawn. SEMA released this press
release:
“We want to thank Congress for
pushing the EPA to withdraw an ill-
conceived proposal. However, confu-
sion reigns: the agency continues to
assert new-found authority under the
Clean Air Act to regulate modification
of vehicles for use in competition. This
means that those converting and rac-
ing competition vehicles and the parts
and services industries that support
them, do so under new EPA policy that
considers the activity illegal. Only
clarifying legislation, such as that of-
fered under the RPMAct, will confirm
that such activity is legal and beyond
the reach of future EPA regulations.
The racing industry and public need a
long-term solution to eliminate any
uncertainty regarding how the Clean
Air Act is interpreted.”
Don’t think this is the end of it. If
anyone believes the EPA bureaucrats
will sulk back into their offices and
move on to some other do-gooder un-
dertaking, they do not know their his-
tory. The EPA apparatchiks will keep
coming back, again and again, and
each defeat will only stiffen their re-
solve. Think of the Terminator.